Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(9): 4269-4279, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2326073

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Epithelial damage together with endothelitis and microvascular thrombi are responsible for COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Iloprost, improves endothelial damage and reduces thrombotic complications with its vasodilator, anti-platelet, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic effects. In our study, we aimed to determine the effect of iloprost on oxygenation, hemodynamics, weaning, and mortality in severe COVID-19 ARDS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted in a pandemic hospital in the city of Istanbul, Turkey. Patients, with severe COVID-19 ARDS, who were receiving iloprost for seven days were included in the study. The demographic data, APACHE II, and SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score) scores (at admission and discharge), pH, PaO2, PCO2, SatO2, lactate, PaO2/FiO2 (inspiratory fractionated oxygen), respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index (peripheral oxygen saturation/fraction of inhaled oxygen), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressures (MAP), heart rate (HR) values were recorded before starting iloprost (T0), and on days of iloprost administration (2.0 nanograms/kg/minute/6 hours/day) (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7), and the day after last day of iloprost administration (Tfinal). Also, mortality was recorded in a retrospective manner. Two groups were formed according to mortality (Group M) and discharge (Group D). RESULTS: A total of 22 patients (16 men, 6 women) were evaluated. Age, APACHE II, SOFA scores were higher in Group M. The lactate value at T1-3-4-5-7 was lower than T0 in both groups. PaO2 value between T2-Tfinal was higher than T0. A statistically significant increase was found in PaO2/FiO2 levels in both groups. The PaO2/FiO2value between T5-Tfinal was significantly lower in Group M compared to Group D. ROX index was significantly higher between T4-Tfinal when compared with T0. CONCLUSIONS: Iloprost improves oxygenation but has no effect on mortality in COVID-19 ARDS.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Male , Humans , Female , Iloprost/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/drug therapy , Prognosis
2.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(10): e25163, 2021 10 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1496813

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension restricts the ability of patients to perform routine physical activities. As part of pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment, inhaled iloprost can be administered via a nebulizer that tracks inhalation behavior. Pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment is guided by intermittent clinical measurements, such as 6-minute walk distance, assessed during regular physician visits. Continuous digital monitoring of physical activity may facilitate more complete assessment of the impact of pulmonary arterial hypertension on daily life. Physical activity tracking with a wearable has not yet been assessed with simultaneous tracking of pulmonary arterial hypertension medication intake. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to digitally track the physical parameters of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension who were starting treatment with iloprost using a Breelib nebulizer. The primary objective was to investigate correlations between changes in digital physical activity measures and changes in traditional clinical measures and health-related quality of life over 3 months. Secondary objectives were to evaluate inhalation behavior, adverse events, and changes in heart rate and sleep quality. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study of adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension in World Health Organization functional class III who were adding inhaled iloprost to existing pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy. Daily distance walked, step count, number of standing-up events, heart rate, and 6-minute walk distance were digitally captured using smartwatch (Apple Watch Series 2) and smartphone (iPhone 6S) apps during a 3-month observation period (which began when iloprost treatment began). Before and at the end of the observation period (within 2 weeks), we also evaluated 6-minute walk distance, Borg dyspnea, functional class, B-type natriuretic peptide (or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D questionnaire), and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index). RESULTS: Of 31 patients, 18 were included in the full analysis (observation period: median 91.5 days, IQR 88.0 to 92.0). Changes from baseline in traditional and digital 6-minute walk distance were moderately correlated (r=0.57). Physical activity (daily distance walked: median 0.4 km, IQR -0.2 to 1.9; daily step count: median 591, IQR -509 to 2413) and clinical measures (traditional 6-minute walk distance: median 26 m, IQR 0 to 40) changed concordantly from baseline to the end of the observation period. Health-related quality of life showed little change. Total sleep score and resting heart rate slightly decreased. Distance walked and step count showed short-term increases after each iloprost inhalation. No new safety signals were identified (safety analysis set: n=30). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that despite challenges, parallel monitoring of physical activity, heart rate, and iloprost inhalation is feasible in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and may complement traditional measures in guiding treatment; however, the sample size of this study limits generalizability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03293407; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03293407. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/12144.


Subject(s)
Hypertension, Pulmonary , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Heart Rate , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Iloprost/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Walking
4.
Nat Rev Cardiol ; 18(3): 194-209, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-936141

ABSTRACT

The core pathology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is infection of airway cells by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that results in excessive inflammation and respiratory disease, with cytokine storm and acute respiratory distress syndrome implicated in the most severe cases. Thrombotic complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease and/or traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and advanced age, are at the highest risk of death from COVID-19. In this Review, we summarize new lines of evidence that point to both platelet and endothelial dysfunction as essential components of COVID-19 pathology and describe the mechanisms that might account for the contribution of cardiovascular risk factors to the most severe outcomes in COVID-19. We highlight the distinct contributions of coagulopathy, thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy to the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and discuss potential therapeutic strategies in the management of patients with COVD-19. Harnessing the expertise of the biomedical and clinical communities is imperative to expand the available therapeutics beyond anticoagulants and to target both thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy. Only with such collaborative efforts can we better prepare for further waves and for future coronavirus-related pandemics.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders/blood , Blood Platelet Disorders/blood , COVID-19/blood , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Inflammation/blood , Thrombosis/blood , Administration, Inhalation , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiology , Blood Coagulation Disorders/physiopathology , Blood Platelet Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Platelet Disorders/etiology , Blood Platelet Disorders/physiopathology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/physiopathology , Endothelium-Dependent Relaxing Factors/therapeutic use , Epoprostenol/therapeutic use , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Iloprost/therapeutic use , Inflammation/etiology , Inflammation/physiopathology , Nitric Oxide/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/blood , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/drug therapy , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/physiopathology , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/immunology , Thrombotic Microangiopathies/blood , Thrombotic Microangiopathies/drug therapy , Thrombotic Microangiopathies/etiology , Thrombotic Microangiopathies/physiopathology , Vascular Diseases/blood , Vascular Diseases/drug therapy , Vascular Diseases/etiology , Vascular Diseases/physiopathology , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism/blood , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/physiopathology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
5.
Drug Dev Res ; 82(2): 217-229, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-798845

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) was first identified in Wuhan, China near the end of 2019. To date, COVID-19 had spread to almost 235 countries and territories due to its highly infectious nature. Moreover, there is no vaccine or Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug. More time is needed to establish one of them. Consequently, the drug repurposing approach seems to be the most attractive and quick solution to accommodate this crisis. In this regard, we performed molecular docking-based virtual screening of antiplatelet FDA-approved drugs on the key two viral target proteins: main protease (Mpro ) and spike glycoprotein (S) as potential inhibitor candidates for COVID-19. In the present study, 15 antiplatelet FDA-approved drugs were investigated against the concerned targets using the Molecular Docking Server. Our study revealed that only cilostazol has the most favorable binding interaction on Mpro (PDB ID: 6LU7) and cilostazol, iloprost, epoprostenol, prasugrel, and icosapent ethyl have a higher binding affinity on spike glycoprotein (S) (PDB ID: 6VYB) compared with recent anti-CoVID-19. Therefore, cilostazol is a promising FDA drug against COVID-19 by inhibiting both Mpro and S protein. The insights gained in this study may be useful for quick approach against COVID-19 in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Coronavirus 3C Proteases/metabolism , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolism , Cilostazol/metabolism , Cilostazol/therapeutic use , Drug Approval , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Drug Repositioning , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/metabolism , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/therapeutic use , Epoprostenol/metabolism , Epoprostenol/therapeutic use , Humans , Iloprost/metabolism , Iloprost/therapeutic use , Molecular Docking Simulation , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/metabolism , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
6.
Trials ; 21(1): 746, 2020 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-731235

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of continuous infusion of the potential endothelial cytoprotective agent prostacyclin (Iloprost) 1 ng/kg/min vs. placebo for 72 hours on pulmonary endotheliopathy in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. TRIAL DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized (1:1, active: placebo), blinded, parallel group exploratory trial PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion criteria are: Adult patients (>18 years); Confirmed COVID-19 infection; Need for mechanical interventions; Endothelial biomarker soluble thrombomodulin >4ng/ml. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Withdrawal from active therapy; Pregnancy (non-pregnancy confirmed by patient being postmenopausal (age 60 or above) or having a negative urine- or plasma-hCG); Known hypersensitivity to iloprost or to any of the other ingredients; Previously included in this trial or a prostacyclin trial within 30 days; Consent cannot be obtained; Life-threatening bleeding defined by the treating physician; Known severe heart failure (NYHA class IV); Suspected acute coronary syndrome The study is conducted at five intensive care units in the Capital Region of Denmark at Rigshospitalet, Herlev Hospital, Hvidovre Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital, Nordsjællands Hospital. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: The patients are randomized to 72-hours continuous infusion of either prostacyclin (Iloprost/Ilomedin) at a dose of 1 ng/kg/min or Placebo (normal saline). MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary endpoint: Days alive without mechanical ventilation in the intensive care units within 28 days RANDOMISATION: The randomisation sequence is performed in permuted blocks of variable sizes stratified for trial site using centralised, concealed allocation. The randomisation sequence is generated 1:1 (active/placebo) using the online randomisation software 'Sealed Envelope' ( https://www.sealedenvelope.com/ ). Once generated the randomisation sequence is formatted and uploaded into Research Electronic Data Capture system (REDCap) to facilitate centralised, web-based allocation according to local written instruction. BLINDING (MASKING): The following are blinded: all clinicians, patients, investigators, and those assessing the outcomes including the statisticians. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): Forty patients are planned to be randomized to each group, with a total sample size of 80 patients. TRIAL STATUS: Protocol version 1.4 dated May 25, 2020. Recruitment is ongoing. The recruitment was started June 15, 2020 and the anticipated finish of recruitment is February 28, 2021 with 90 days follow up hereafter. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration at clinicaltrialregisters.eu; EudraCT no. 2020-001296-33 on 3 April 2020 and at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04420741 on 9 June 2020 FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1).In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Iloprost/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Denmark , Endothelium, Vascular/metabolism , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Intensive Care Units , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombomodulin/metabolism , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL